Comparison
AWS Sustainability vs BoaviztAPI
AWS Sustainability vs BoaviztAPI: AWS console service for viewing account-level carbon emissions and water withdrawals. Open API for assessing the…
| Field | AWS Sustainability AWS console service for viewing account-level carbon emissions and water withdrawals. | BoaviztAPI Open API for assessing the environmental impacts of servers, cloud instances and ICT equipment. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Free |
| Pricing published | Custom quote only | Public pricing |
| Starting price | Free | |
| Licensing | Proprietary | Open source |
| Pricing details | The AWS Sustainability user guide does not list a price; the service is presented as part of the AWS console for viewing account-level carbon and water data. | AGPL-3.0; the README points to a public demo API, and the API can be run locally with Docker or installed with pip. |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | Cloud, Web, API | API, Web |
| Region support | Global | Global |
| Compliance | Not stated | Not stated |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Last verified | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-22 |
Editor's take on AWS Sustainability
Suited to AWS customers who need account-level carbon and water figures from the provider itself, broken down by region and service, rather than estimates inferred from billing. The recorded trade-off is coverage: it reports AWS usage only, so a multi-cloud estate needs a second source, and carbon data is published monthly for complete months, which rules out using it as a live optimisation signal. An API and Data Exports to S3 suit teams moving data into their own warehouse, while the user guide lists no separate price. Buyers wanting cross-provider normalisation or real-time tracking should look at dedicated tools.
Read the AWS Sustainability listingEditor's take on BoaviztAPI
Built for engineers and analysts who need component-level embedded and usage impacts for servers, cloud instances, CPUs, GPUs and storage, and who are comfortable calling an HTTP API from their own tooling. The trade-off is integration and obligation: it returns modelled impacts from published methodologies rather than measured emissions, so results are only as current as its data sources, and AGPL-3.0 licensing shapes how derived services can be offered. A public demo API speeds evaluation, while production use means hosting it and keeping methodology and data updated; teams wanting a ready reporting interface should pair it with a frontend such as Datavizta.
Read the BoaviztAPI listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons