Comparison
CarbonCloud vs Kabaun
CarbonCloud vs Kabaun: Product carbon footprint platform for food brands and suppliers. AI-native carbon management platform built on a GHG Protocol…
| Field | CarbonCloud Product carbon footprint platform for food brands and suppliers. | Kabaun AI-native carbon management platform built on a GHG Protocol calculation engine. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Subscription |
| Pricing published | Custom quote only | Public pricing |
| Starting price | EUR 190 / month | |
| Licensing | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing details | No pricing page is published on carboncloud.com; the site routes commercial questions through a demo request and its contact page. | Monthly prices excl. VAT: Starter EUR 190, Standard EUR 450, Business EUR 890; Enterprise is a custom quote. Annual billing is 20% cheaper and no credit card is required. |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API, Cloud |
| Region support | EU, UK | EU |
| Compliance | CSRD, ESRS, SBTi | CSRD, ESRS, GHG Protocol, SBTi |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Last verified | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-22 |
Editor's take on CarbonCloud
Built for food and beverage brands and their suppliers, where product-level footprints and supplier data sharing matter more than generic corporate reporting. Footprints are calculated per product, ClimateHub shares climate data along the supply chain, and reporting covers CSRD E1 and E5 plus SBTi FLAG targets. The trade-off is pricing opacity: no pricing page is published and commercial questions go through a demo request. An API is recorded and regions cover the EU and UK. Companies outside food value chains should pick a general carbon accounting platform instead.
Read the CarbonCloud listingEditor's take on Kabaun
Built for European finance and sustainability teams that want a GHG Protocol calculation engine plus CSRD, ESRS E1, SBTi and BEGES outputs without a sales-only price list. Published monthly tiers from EUR 190 to EUR 890 excluding VAT let a small team size cost before contacting sales, annual billing is cheaper, and data hosting stays in the EU. The trade-off is scope: the 270,000 ADEME, DEFRA and EPA factors serve EU-focused reporting, while buyers needing factor sources or contracting arrangements outside that set should verify fit first.
Read the Kabaun listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons