Comparison

Greenly vs Kabaun

Greenly vs Kabaun: Carbon accounting and ESG platform for measuring, reporting and reducing emissions. AI-native carbon management platform built on a…

Carbon AccountingBoth listings verified
Field-by-field comparison of Greenly and Kabaun
FieldGreenly

Carbon accounting and ESG platform for measuring, reporting and reducing emissions.

Kabaun

AI-native carbon management platform built on a GHG Protocol calculation engine.

Pricing modelCustom quoteSubscription
Pricing publishedPricing on requestPublic pricing
Starting priceEUR 190 / month
LicensingProprietaryProprietary
Pricing detailsThe pricing page lists the GHG Report Compliance, Climate Action Ready and Net Zero Contributor plans, all routed through a Get in touch form; no prices are published.Monthly prices excl. VAT: Starter EUR 190, Standard EUR 450, Business EUR 890; Enterprise is a custom quote. Annual billing is 20% cheaper and no credit card is required.
Free tierNoNo
Assets covered
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API, Cloud
Region supportEU, USEU
ComplianceCSRD, GHG Protocol, SBTiCSRD, ESRS, GHG Protocol, SBTi
API availableYesYes
Last verified2026-10-222026-10-22

Editor's take on Greenly

Aimed at European companies that want carbon accounting plus CSRD and SBTi reporting from a single vendor. The trade-off is recorded plainly: the pricing page names three plans but routes all of them through a contact form, so buyers must talk to sales before knowing cost, while 100+ API integrations are listed and ADEME, GHG Protocol and CDP certifications are claimed. Coverage includes product life-cycle assessments and supplier engagement, with region support recorded as the EU and US. Buyers who need a self-serve price list should treat it as a sales-led purchase.

Read the Greenly listing

Editor's take on Kabaun

Built for European finance and sustainability teams that want a GHG Protocol calculation engine plus CSRD, ESRS E1, SBTi and BEGES outputs without a sales-only price list. Published monthly tiers from EUR 190 to EUR 890 excluding VAT let a small team size cost before contacting sales, annual billing is cheaper, and data hosting stays in the EU. The trade-off is scope: the 270,000 ADEME, DEFRA and EPA factors serve EU-focused reporting, while buyers needing factor sources or contracting arrangements outside that set should verify fit first.

Read the Kabaun listing

Judgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.

All comparisons